A patient wrote a damaging post about her physician online. This could be categorized as?

The situation described falls under libel because it involves a written statement made online that could damage the physician's reputation. Libel specifically refers to false statements that are written or published and can harm an individual's reputation. In this case, the patient has posted damaging information about the physician on a public platform, which aligns with the definition of libel.

Slander, on the other hand, involves spoken defamatory statements rather than written ones. The other terms, standard of care and quid pro quo, are not related to defamation. Standard of care pertains to the level of professionalism expected in medical practice, while quid pro quo refers to a favor or advantage granted in return for something, which does not apply in the context of a damaging online post.